Marking criteria for the evaluation

Each candidate will evaluate and reflect on the creative process and their experience of it. Candidates will evaluate their work electronically. The format of the evaluation has some flexibility and its form can be negotiated between teacher and student: it may take place with individual candidates or with the production group as a whole, or each individual candidate or production group may make a formal or informal presentation to the whole class.
The questions that must be addressed in the evaluation are:
• In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
• How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
• What have you learned from your audience feedback?
• How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?

Level 3 12–15 marks
• There is proficient understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
• There is proficient understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
• There is proficient understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
• There is proficient understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
• There is proficient skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
• There is proficient ability to communicate.
• There is proficient use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.

Level 4 16–20 marks
• There is excellent understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
• There is excellent understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
• There is excellent understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
• There is excellent understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
• There is excellent skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
• There is excellent ability to communicate.
• There is excellent use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.